WW up!

[aavidbacon]

toadslayer72 said:

M.U.G.E.N said:

Mr.Metralha said:

aavidbacon said:

Mr.Metralha said:

Funny how people didn't bother with the statistical tie talk when the Wii was on top =)

After 4 years, people still need to label 1st, 2nd and 3rd, like that is gonna change who's the market leader this gen.

It´s because when a console is 100k in front, at least, is just silly talk...

So, which console is 100K in front this week? 

you're missing the point he is making. If a console is having a lead of like 100k (actually even around 20k should be enough imo) it's not a statistical tie. Hence when wii had such a lead over HD consoles, no need to bring in that term into a discussion at all, wii had clearly won. So it was a good thing, why you're so worked up over it I don't understand

I think his original point is being missed. I think what he was saying initially was that no one gave a shit about there being a statistical tie for second place. At least that's how I interpreted it.

Yeah I got that too, but back then it wasn´t so common sales this big for the HD twins and a difference so small. When PS3 was doing 100k a week, a 10 k differencve was enough to set a winner.

I even remember a bet LeoJ did that PS3 wasn´t going bellow 120 k all year and people doubted.