By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
D-Joe said:
ethomaz said:
D-Joe said:
Booh! said:
Simple math: if those 537k were all sold in 2009, then the 360 would be at 1181k (because 537k plus 20% = 644k). But it sold less than 537k in 2009 (because some units were sold in 2008 and 2007), so it is lower than 1.2 millions.

...just 814k-537k=277k x 120%=332k 814k=1146k

The only little error here is the fact PS3 was the best selling console in Australia in 2010... and it sold ~320k (317k)... so 360 sold less than 332k, less than 320k.

Your and my maths are the same...that's the only little difference (PS3 > 360 in 2010 AU).

 

do you think PS3 can sell more than DS(end of 2009=2571381 in 2010?if yes,whatever

if not,i don't think 26.5% can be best selling CONSOLE(Wii 360 PS3 PS2)

in the end,read this again,i get it,will you?

"According to  Sony  , the PS3 dominated local hardware sales, making up 26.5 percent of all  console  sales in the region last year--the highest percentage share of any  manufacturer  ."

 

 

Yeah. I believe. And 2,571,381 is limetime not 2010... in 2010 PS3 sold more than every other console in Australia.

And why people here thrust when "According to Microsoft" and not when "According with Sony".

For comparison the Microsoft statement:

By comparison, Sony's Redmond-based competitor, Microsoft, declined to offer any Australian-specific hardware details in its release, revealing only that the Xbox 360 experienced its biggest year to date in 2010 and saw a 20 percent increase in total sales over 2009. Microsoft Australia declined to confirm total Xbox 360 sales to GameSpot AU, stating that it "does not release regionalized data."