By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ethomaz said:
D-Joe said:
Booh! said:
Simple math: if those 537k were all sold in 2009, then the 360 would be at 1181k (because 537k plus 20% = 644k). But it sold less than 537k in 2009 (because some units were sold in 2008 and 2007), so it is lower than 1.2 millions.

...just 814k-537k=277k x 120%=332k 814k=1146k

The only little error here is the fact PS3 was the best selling console in Australia in 2010... and it sold ~320k (317k)... so 360 sold less than 332k, less than 320k.

Your and my maths are the same...that's the only little difference (PS3 > 360 in 2010 AU).

do you think PS3 can sell more than DS(end of 2009=2571381 in 2010?if yes,whatever

if not,i don't think 26.5% can be best selling CONSOLE(Wii 360 PS3 PS2)

in the end,read this again,i get it,will you?

"According to  Sony  , the PS3 dominated local hardware sales, making up 26.5 percent of all  console  sales in the region last year--the highest percentage share of any  manufacturer  ."