D-Joe said:
ethomaz said:
landguy1 said:
ethomaz said:
AussieGecko said:
That is 1.1 million not 1.3mil. You don't live here so you don't really have a close input about what goes on here. There is no chance 200k will be caught up by Sony in aspect of Kinect's popularity down here.
Key Point you are wrong, stick with Brazil.
|
Both console sold arround 1.3 million in Australia and New Zealand... so the difference is less than 50k... and Sony will catch that this quarter... face it.
PS3 sells better than the 360 in Australia.
|
The problem that your comment had, was that you pointed to a bit of info that says 1.1 million in australia. So, when you keep saying 1.3M it sounds wrong. Clarify that and it might make sense.
|
Ok... by GFK.
PS3 Australia (2010): 1.1m
PS3 Australia (2009): 783k PS3 Australia (2009): 814k
PS3 (2010) > 360 (2010) in Australia so PS3 sold 317k in 2010... in the best case 360 sold 300k.
360 Australia (2010): 1.1m (estimated)
So this quarter 360 will outsell 360 in Australia.
More...
PS3 New Zealand (2009): 117k 360 New Zealand (2009): 140k
Extrapoling to 2010...
PS3 New Zealand (2010): 150k (estimated) 360 New Zealand (2010): 180k (estimated)
So Australia and New Zealand has both consoles arround 1.3 million now... and PS3 sold more in 2010... so will be the same in 2011 IMO.
|
sorry but who said 360 sold 1.1m?GFK said PS3 sold 1.1m in 2010
360 sold 537k in launch to 2009,and 2010 sales more than 2009 20%
|
Simple math: if those 537k were all sold in 2009, then the 360 would be at 1181k (because 537k plus 20% = 644k). But it sold less than 537k in 2009 (because some units were sold in 2008 and 2007), so it is lower than 1.2 millions.