After reading the OP for a second time I still dont see it. The op says that Geoff said that 45 was too much for a portable game, but i dont see that quoted anywhere. I agree with Reggie that a full fledged game warrants a full price, that goes without saying. But I dont agree that a 2 dollar game is disposable. Ive seen alot of people play 2 dollar games and keep playing them.(Bejeweled) If I may i would say that a retail game is more disposable, becasue with that i can always trade it in or sell it, thats just me. As for the "mentality", some of those games should be no more than two bucks, some of them should be free. I dont think anyone playing those is going to be of the mindset that they should pay 2 bucks for say a Zelda game, people are not that unreasonable, but its not like you can charge 30 bucks for Angry Birds, no one is going to buy it for that.
IMHO I wish there was a a link to the actual full article, because we have no quotes from the Geoff guy and it seems a lttle one sided in favor of Reggie
