makingmusic476 on 07 February 2011
I understand that tracking all these games costs money, and in order to improve the reliability of the numbers and expand the site's features, an increase in revenue will be needed, but why are you locking away almost all useful pre-existing features behind this new fee? Shouldn't you instead be enticing users to pay the fee by offering new features facilitated directly by the fee? It feels rather dickish to me, tbh. Instead of the site getting better, it's getting worse for non-subscribers while not changing much for subscribers.
And what the hell is up with barring access to said features months before Pro is even available?
