D-Joe said:
DarkintheLight said:
D-Joe said:
DarkintheLight said:
bannedagain said:
DarkintheLight said:
bannedagain said:
DarkintheLight said:
Shipment numbers are accurate, meaning if VG chartz was accurate they would be consistent with Sony's (and MSes and Nintendo's) shipment numbers, trying to be accurate in every single region is just stupid if you don't have accurate sources in the region, more accurate to make an overall estimate |
There are a lot more ps3's on the shelfs then xbox's. So that means there where more xbox's sold because they where out of stock everywhere. I had to drive to hours to get a xbox before christmas. all the while ps3's where all over the place.
SO THE NUMBERS ARE RIGHT.
PS3'S ON SHELF = NOT SOLD.
XBOX 360 OFF THE SHELFS AND NO WHERE TO BE FOUND = SOLD
GET IT.
|
You obviously don't understand the meaning of the word consistent
|
Yes you are right. they are not very consistant and I did miss that I Guess. Was making a point to people that the sales are not off as of now. They are now most likely right on, after a bunch of adjustments.
|
They aren't accurate though 360s are way too high and ps3s are about right, it's hard to tell if they do have 2 million on shelves it's too high but I doubt they have that much on the shelves
|
well PS3 is 1.55m on shelves(between VGC and Sony shipment)
|
Like I said if it's 2 million on the self VG charts numbers for ps3 are too high, or it could be right on, or they could be a little low, can go either way for ps3, but 360 numbers are too high, either way you can't use vg numbers to determine the number on selves if you are trying to see if VG chartz is consistent, but it seems close enough for ps3
|
when i said that?
|
was using it in the general it's mathematically impossible sense
