By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fighter said:
CGI-Quality said:

It's apparent that you aren't actually reading and/or understanding much of what others and myself are posting. Meta scores don't absolutely determine quality., they don't. The basis of quality can be determined a number of ways, and while Metacritic may be a contributor, it isn't THE dictator.

I see that you ignored a very important question, more than once, which now leads me to believe you're derailing this thread deliberately, so 'll ask this just once more - what do/does Metacritic/Meta scores have to do with GT5 being PS3's highest selling exclusive?

You must, consciously or unconsciously, refer to some indicator of a game's quality in order for you to pay for certain games and not for others, am i right ?

So, you ought as well to remember at least one of them that you believe is very useful to the masses. Whould you by any chance recall at least one them that would be a better indicator than metas ?

No ? I thought so... Buh-bye now lady (thanks for the ban you f ¨*)

See the Italics, Bolded and Underlined in CGI's post.

The word "contributor" is kinda important.

Out of interest, when you look at a meta score, what's the cutoff point before you decide to not buy a game?