| MrBubbles said: no i dont approve of tracking down people who served their punishments for their crimes. the sentences were lawful and not outside the of bounds of sanity. as has been proven by the further charges against the one individual, the law is clearly working in proper order. when the law is unable or unwilling to serve justice, then individuals should take action. society deemed those punishments worthy of those crimes....you dont agree with that? then work and have those punishments changed, dont administer your own version of justice because you dont agree with what society has already decided. i approve of the death penalty . my country does not view that as proper punishment. it is not for me to go out and execute those people who have been found guilty of the crimes. if i feel strongly enough... i, and other like-minded individuals, can lobby the government to work on having the laws changed ...and we, as a society, can provide that justice. |
It was not an appropriate sentence. There are people who do less, and get much harsher punishments. 8 years in a juvenile institution, where they had great living conditions and access to education is hardly an appropriate punishment for torturing and killing a 2 year old child.
The further charges do nothing more than to proove that the psychologists who said he was no longer a threat to society lied, and that he never should've been released in the first place. The fact that he only got 2 years for taht, even though he violated his parole prooves that the justice system is incompetent.
It's also not my job to work on gettign the laws changed in the UK, as I don't live there.
"I don't understand how someone could like Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, but not like Twilight!!!"
"Last book I read was Brokeback Mountain, I just don't have the patience for them unless it's softcore porn."
(The Voice of a Generation and Seece)
"If you cant stand the sound of your own voice than dont become a singer !!!!!"
(pizzahut451)
