pizzahut451 said:
Conegamer said:
pizzahut451 said:
Conegamer said:
leatherhat said:
It would have better graphics- and with equal gameplay the xbox version would be better. Gameplay> graphics but there's no reason not to try and have both.
|
This is where I have to step in
The key thing about Galaxy 2 (and the first) for me is that the spin attack was implemented so well. How would it be done with the same satisfying feel on the 360?
Also, how about collecting the star bits? How are you going to point at the screen, collect the star bits without ruining the camera?
Not a bash at you or anyone, just questions. I agree that you should strive for both, but you shouldn't sacrifice gameplay for graphics. Galaxy 2 was a good example, but Epic Mickey or The Last Story would be just as fine to choose...
|
PS3 can do all that and PLUS add amazing HD graphics
|
PLUS add amazing development costs PLUS add amazing game development cycles!
The thing is, remember, would it make it any better, and worth it?
|
Im not here to discuss developing of the game, that wont effect my game experience at all. Im just saying, no doubt this game would have been much better on PS3 thanks to PS3's hardware. It could have had co-op or maybe bigger levels, HD graphics, trophies, maybe even some DLC...thats not to say that Wii version of the game is bad (its actually the best platformer in 2010 IMO), but i think it would have been better on PlayStation 3
Quick question: How much time and money do you think it took for GOW Collection to be released?
|
...I Don't know. But probably not long...
Yeah I suppose, MAYBE on the PS3 it could be worthwhile, I'm talking about the 360 though, as is what the thread suggests. Without Move, it would be much worth
Let's leave it at that
