i dont know why but recently ive been hearing a lot of comments like this which are completely baseless.
if you actually look, critics and gamers alike are rating wii games much higher than what you would refer to as "hardcore" games like call of duty (when the real hardcore know its an average fps (still fun in a way though)). I believe wii has some of the highest rated games ever.
you honestly cant be putting metroid on the same level as uncharted or goldeneye on the same level as killzone. if you could, i dont think developers would spend the time and money developing their game engines to the extent they have done and instead just make ok looking sd games and just focus on a few platforming elements.
what im saying is that both games exist, casual and hardcore. you cant deny the fact that casuals dont play games like killzone but a large proportion of the wii userbase are casuals and the games are marketed towards them. its just a fact that hardcore games will contain more physics and in most occassions better graphics than casual games.
this is a neverending debate but thats my perspective of it anyway....
edit: oh and why do you make it sound like the wii is singled out? everyone very well knows all consoles face hate and so does PC gaming.
e.g. xbox, RROD, HD-DVD fail, casual kinect
ps3 - 'ps3 has no games', '$600 LOL', 'XBL>PSN',
pc - piracy, no exclusives, starcraft is same old thing, 'wow nerds'
you get the point.....
