greenmedic88 said:
Seriously, that does sound more like something SCE would have said back in 2006, although in this case, at least Nintendo is still pulling a profit on each unit sold, even at $250. And even in the days of elementary school kids with iPods, somehow I just don't see the average family buying a bunch of $300-400 handheld video game players for the kids. |
The simple answer is that those are seen as having more uses than games, which means people accept higher prices. And no, slapping on features to gaming devices doesn't change that perception, as we saw with the PS3's price.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








