famousringo said:
NotStan said:
Just my personal opinion, but I think most of the people who buy the newer Apple products are sheep. In most cases the entry product, let's take iPod nano for example, I have one, I brought it a year and a half ago, it's 16GB and blue. I see insane amount of people instead of opting for that cheaper option willing to pay some £30-50 more to get the now newer version of it, the only difference is the camera, question, WHY THE FUCK, would you want a camera on your iPod nano for!? Same with iPhone 4G, bar the design there is really not that much different with 3G, and the price difference is now in the region of £100-200 on the market. I really can't see how people are willing to pay extra money just to get a miniature useless features and some social status elevation as a result. I don't follow sheep, I get an android.
EDIT: Same shit with iPod touch, LETS TACKLE A CAMERA ON IT AND SELL IT FOR MORE YE?
|
You don't actually have a clue as to what the hardware differences between these models are, do you? Why don't you look up the specs of the 3GS versus the iPhone 4 and then call people sheep for paying an extra 20% for the premium model.
|
As I said just my personal opinion, I really doubt that when it comes to releasing the hardware, the upgrade is worthy the pricetag, if anything just the apple logo alone makes it worth £200. I mean kudos to Steve Jobs for stunning the masses into purchasing every upgrade that comes out despite the somewhat sublime differences. The 1st/maybe 2nd gen are what's really new additions to the market, anything else does not justify such a high price tag, as again, my opinion.
