Squilliam said:
On the first part I haven't played the titles with Move so therefore I cannot comment on first had experience however your argument is sound so I agree on that basis. On the second part I totally agree. On the third part I believe discounting them completely is wrong because they are true Move experiences and you can use a Move controller with them. In a way I sort of think of them as forwards compatible titles, valuable but of unknown utility like PS2 backwards compatibility was to the PS3 as it is a case by case basis per gamer. |
But from my view is it correct to assume that you see them as being legitimate Move titles?
If so, then that is what I expected from you. 
I don't believe that since a game was made with both controls schemes in mind that an optimal Move experience wasn't persued.
I believe that assuming that since a title has both controls schemes , thinking the Move experience was only an afterthought and a lot of work wasn't put into it to make it as best as could be is completely ignorant, seeing as how people have yet to even play the titles, let alone in the case of Killzone 3 the Move controls are getting quite a bit of positive feedback from the press.
I believe that thinking that a balance can not be found between the (2) controls schemes is bad. I believe it can and will be found. Which is why I believe that games with both schemes can be considered Move title.s
Thinking otherwise only shows a complete distrust in what the industry is capable of and shows no faith in that it can move forward and expand to gamers of all different preferences.
iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.
Currently playing:
Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)

![]()







