MaxwellGT2000 said:
Basically you're not making a solid point by being wishy washy, if you want to champion for Sony, outright say it and make some valid points, if you're going to say he has a relationship with hardware companies mention all of them he has a relationship with not just one cause it will be brought up if you start to debate, if you're going to champion PSWii bring up points that make that valid or PS360 same deal... if you want to have debate/discussion in the forums you're not that convincing if you make a point then retract its importance in your next post. Also why would he say BBS could be called KH3 if there isn't the possibility of KH3 being put on the handhelds? It's a main story and just as long as KH1 or 2, with just as much content, it's the first game on PSP that truly feels like a fleshed out PS2 era home console game on the go, so he obviously will put that sort of work into a handheld title and leaves it open that... well Kingdom Hearts can and will go many places. |
or you could just say he's never developed a Microsoft title and be done with it, the only reason for making a slanted comment is to try and convince others its coming to a Sony console, but thing is he has a relationship with Square that takes precedent over any relationship with a hardware company... games go where Square wants them to, in KH3 case where Disney and Square want. But that's because you've only read what you wanted to read.
My main point was that they already have the engine for PS360.
