Leave it to Razer to make a real motion sensing controller that works

[ssj12]

Icyedge said:

ssj12 said:

PullusPardus said:

 

its the same though, sensor or camera.

What a strange graph. Gyrometer gives the absolute orientation, its reliable and predictable as well as having a low latency. Im not saying the Razer controller doesnt do it faster though. Also, it says they are comparing the types of 3D controller. Thats some big bulls*** since the 3D controllers on the market (Move, Wiimote, Kinect) all use more than 1 technology.

the chart covers that... camera covers PS Eye or Kinect by itself. Added gyro covers Move controller addition. Accelerometer gyro covers Wii Motion Plus. Ultrasonic... I guess Kinect too? Which really
falls perfectly into that chart. The chart covers each individual technology. Combining them gives some improvement with additional cost (like Move which has a $40 controller with a $40 camera plus the need sometimes for a second controller for absolute control).

Also Move and the Wii Remote have limited range of motion considering its easy to block the sensors with just your body. Kinect, well... its Kinect... which has a vastly limited control scheme for a massive price tag.