| M.U.G.E.N said:
|
The problem you have is that you're calling for a man to be held legally responsible for the crimes of others. It is akin to saying that a markmanship instructor should be held liable if any of his students becomes a murderer. That does not fly. Not morally, and certainly not legally.
| M.U.G.E.N said:
the analogy you provided was overly simplistic and as you said imperfect. Let me use the same line of thought and give you the opposite end of the outcome. A guy distributes weapons, which he made without permission, to the masses. You can definitely use it to defend yourself, shoot a fly and enter the guinness and be famous BUT this will lead to more harm than good. As yours this is by no means perfect. But like I said for a few neat tricks I won't support piracy, doesn't matter which console it is. |
You're actually providing a better analogy, for my purposes, than I did. The gun distributor in question would not be held liable. In fact, gun manufacturers are NOT held liable for crimes committed with their products.







