kowenicki said:
BMaker11 said:
AussieGecko said:
BMaker11 - If HDMI isnt used the console resolution changes. Native doesnt mean minimum it means it is designed to run at that resolution. Therefore your assumption is incorrect.
OP I dunno but it would be interesting to find out. The 3D games would have to be wouldnt they?
|
A lot of games can "run" at 1080P. Halo 3 for example. But we know it's native resolution is really 1154x640. Wipeout HD, on the other hand, has a native resolution of 1920x1080. That's the kind of difference I was talking about.
@kowenicki
I was under the assumption that it was needed to have true 1080P, at least for consoles. I wasn't entirely sure, hence all the question marks in my original post. But regardless, in terms of natively running games at 1080P for the 360, I thought the 360 only upscaled. I know you can technically play them at that resolution....but I was playing a SNES emulator on my computer when it was hooked up to my 40" HDTV....the game was outputting 1080P but I mean....
And that's what I thought the situation was similar to on the 360 (albeit not as extreme).
And lastly, you keep saying "who cares", but the guy mere wanted a few numbers and little discussion. Nothing wrong with that
|
The 360 doesnt "just" upscale to 1080p... although yes it can upscale all games to 1080p, it is also entirely capable of running true 1080p and does. I dont understand why people even think this cant be done? It comes from the sony fanboy propaganda of its early life I guess.
|
Like I said, I was under the assumption as such. I hadn't really looked into myself....just saying what I've heard over the years