Khuutra said:
Because the man was black. Huh-doy. More, because statistically, black men are more often wrongly accused by an enormous degree: http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Facts_on_PostConviction_DNA_Exonerations.php Talk whatever you want, those numbers speak for themselves. |
It doesn't matter. Unless you have proof that there was prejudice for this man's case, you are simply talking out of your ass.
The most idiotic part is that your link just further supports my argument, because those 158 black men wrongfully convicted are statistically insignificant compared to the hundreds of thousands of black people convicted. Those 158 represent less than 0.05% of black people convicted.
Are we going to cry "racism" everytime an african is convicted? Should we also cry "racism" when a white man is convicted? Or how about a latino? Or an asian?