ethomaz said:
Rainbird said:
ethomaz said:
My complain with score (all the reviews scores actually) is how can a reviewer give a low score for a game way better than original... so the original not deserve the first score? or the sequel deserve a better one?
|
That's what happens when the bar is raised, and the bar is especially raised for a game as beloved as LBP. LBP was recognized for its new ideas, and while LBP2 has many new ideas of its own, none of them are as groundbreaking or gamechanging as what we saw in the first game. So while LBP2 is still a great game, it builds upon what was done with LBP rather than really expanding the LBP framework, which means it gets slightly lower scores.
|
Ok. You and me knews that but the normal reader of the magazine? People that just read de final score...
LBP: 10/10
LBP2: 9/10
So... LBP is better than LBP2... I have LBP so why I may buy the new one? LBP is for casual gamers and casual gamer not read the fucking review... just read the score.
That's happed with all other reviewers... and the hability to compare reviews by score became wrong... just because the reviewers don't have a common sense for their scores.
|
That's not really great logic. EDGE gave Halo 3 10/10, so why should I bother with Halo: Reach since it only got 9/10 and is obviously worse?
Essay Pro