By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
oniyide said:

LordtheKnigtht fair enough and points taken, I think the problem with Wii devs. is that they feel since there are not alot of these FPSs or "core" games on Wii anyway, that they can slap some crap together and people will buy it. THe irony is is that they cant seem to grasp that maybe most of those Wii owners or at least half HAVE an HD console, so you really have to try harder on the Wii to make your game stand out from those games. Why would I buy a Wii FPSs if there are a dozen better ones on an HD?? Goldeneye IMO is a step in the right direction, it is a nice throwback to how FPSs played in older gens. Hard to find that on HDs. I think thats why its doing respectable numbers. Where Conduit IMO just wasnt that good, Sega god bless their souls put so much emphasis on that Wiimote that they forgot to actually make the game fun. I might skip out on 2 also unless it is truly better than GE (doubt it)


Um, High Voltage made Conduit. Sega just published it. Conduit 2 might be a lot better (and at least HVS basically admitted the shortcomings were on their end). I'll just wait for word of mouth to see how much it improved.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs