Who are you for? EA, Jason West and Vince Zampella or activision?

[Kasz216]

sapphi_snake said:

Kasz216 said:

Only if proven before they breach said contracts themselves.  Hence you know, why you'd lawyer up.

I'm not "buying" anything.  I'm looking at the facts objectivly.  I mean hell, I can't even name the last activision game I've bought.  I recieved Red Steel as a gift... that's all I can thnk of.

One the one hand, you've got West and Zampella,  who are pretty much known for this kind of thing, who definitly did something illegal that everyone can agree with.

On the otherhand you have activision... who may or may not have done something wrong... and who specifically mention correspondense to them about said event.  Which either they have or it's more or less an auto-lose so there is no point to bring it up unless it exists unless they exist.

I mean, have you even bothered to look at the evidence that HAS released so far? 

There are text messages of Zampella while working at activison talking about how he did something specifically to hurt activision and "COD: WaW". 

You are taking the side who is pretty much already proven guilty of something, (or at least there is heavy proof they are guilty) against the side of someone in which there is no proof against them.

Red Steel was developed and published by Ubisoft. I just thought I'd make that correction.

Ah right, shit what does Activision even make?

To be honest I don't buy "big studio" games too often.

Lets look at a list

Ah Prototype, I boguht Prototype.... after that my last activision game bought was....

Gladius for the gamecube i think.  Actually... I think I got that for X-mas.

So Lost Kingdoms for the Gamecube.