Lingyis said:
i don't think he's trying to convince anyone--it's just his opinion! to me it's insightful why he made GoW the way it is. and clearly he knows he's in the minority. if you think what he says is suspect since he's on sony, it's good that you're pointing that out. after all, you tend not to trash the players on your own team. i don't get your concept of a blog--things he says there is open to criticism, that's the whole point. same with interviews. if people find him jealous and envious and it bothers him, he wouldn't have posted or said it in the first place. that being said, it is a little funny. not "PHAIL" funny but well worthy of a chuckle. |
Am I to expect Mr. Barlog had absolutely no idea what to expect from Mario Galaxy? Is he not privy to the same game news I am? Did he not see Bowser and Peach in the game? Was he expecting much different than previous Mario games? Remember, not much on the internet is spur of the moment. It's hard to wing a blog or forum post.
If his thing is story as he sees it, then that's ok, but his lack of understanding why people think "its the second coming" is curious to say the least. They think so because the game is such an experience, the play so fun, the graphics so wonderous, the soundtrack being the hands-down best of the year, no matter what those other awards say... That is Mario Galaxy's "story," per se, and it is the same story told to him by those other designers. Since he doesn't see it in the game itself, it's possible that he does not understand. I hope no ulterior motive is ascribed to his post such as petty competitor bickering, but at the same time he must be open to the no doubt throngs of emails and comments telling him that his characerization of Mario Galaxy's conceptual story as "vapid" is mischaracterized and possibly an attention-seeking behavior set, which is troubling, but expected should that ulterior motive be true.