RolStoppable said:
EA has been losing money for years and they needed a scapegoat. Let's look at their possible excuses when investors ask them about their current position: 1. We made bad decisions, predicted the market wrong and as a result our company is on the decline now. Not viable, suggests that the company is badly managed. 2. Our current position is not our fault, it's because consumers of a certain gaming platform are very picky about their purchases and it's not in our powers to change anything about that. Viable, puts the whole blame on Nintendo. Your argument rests on the premise that EA knows how to do business, but they haven't been profiting for quite some time now. All of EA's major development teams are and have been working on games that won't be released on the Wii. Your claim is that non-Nintendo platforms make them more money, but there is no evidence for that to be true. Quite the contrary is the case. Last generation EA didn't need any Nintendo platform to post profits, but now they are apparently dependent on them to make money. What this basically means is that something has gone horribly wrong for them on non-Nintendo platforms this generation. |
Oh and btw I am a fan of you Rol :D! i visit this site since last year and your arguments are great, and you make funny threads :)
looking forward to one of your threads :P







