Viper1 said:
If you were content, then you'd have no overt reaction to my posts. You are the one showing insecurity by applying my posts to mean a negative despite their nuetral stance. This is a common practive among those who feel the need to justify their associations and place anything external subjectivity regarding their aqssociations upon themselves and feel the need to defend it staunchly. It's worse when even a neutrally subjective verbage triggers this association. I didn't need to formulate my posts any differently than I did. A statement was made regarding the classification of Kinect. I reposted with the proper classification. Success of Kinect and the classification are irrelavent to that debate. You seem set on intertwining the 2 which stems again from the justifcation issues I mentioned earlier. I can't help but notice that I've stated Kinect is a success numerous times now yet you fail to admit that. So not only are you applying a negative connotation to nuetral verbage but are intentionally ignoring positive verbage to further your justification issue. |
A blog has nothing to do with my life for one. second, you commented more on this thread, so what does that say about you. third, I'm not insecure but annoyed by the biased points always against microsoft. Forth, I used what you said against you.
Fifth I'm done with you. You have now clue what Psychology is about and love act as if you do. YOU DON'T
I only get annoyed by commenters such as, well. You get it=

I might catch what you have and won't continue this with you.LOL







