Conegamer said:
Immortal said:
Conegamer said:
Immortal said:
Honestly. it depends on the specific genre/game. To say that Wii can or cannot sell "core" or "mature" games is stupid. If every CoD game till the last one has been handicapped on the Wii, obviously the CoD fanbase will be on PS360. All those small new IPs, if they're not attempting to directly steal from a PS360 fanbase, will almost certainly sell better on Wii than on the PS3 or 360, simply because of the larger base.
And they'll definitely make more profit.
|
Did you even read my OP?
If so;
I agree with you to an extent. However, what is a "core" game anyway? It all comes down to what gamers view it as, TBF. I'd count brawl, Galaxy, DKCR et al as "core" games, but modern gamers don't se it this way due it not having guns and going "pew pew"
Maybe someone needs to develop what on earth "hardcore" actually is
Hmm...
*scribbles down in ideas pad for new thread" 
If not;
Read the OP. Then maybe you'll realise that what I'm saying is games tend to sell worse on the PS360 then the wii.
It's called this; after all, it is "against the grain"!
|
Well, I did. I was just adding more stuff randomly, :P. I'm serious, xD.
I was just supporting your OP because a lot of people may not find games that sell as little as under 100k proof.
Oh, and that's what I think too, but the reason the term was basically coined this generation was because, well...
"Core game, as opposed to Wii game"
|
But what is classed as a core game? Surely, in which case, no game is "core" if it comes down to artistic styling, because all games have different looks? And many Nintendo games would be "core" if it came down to difficulty...
I saw this great comic once, well, hear it is. This explains my thoughts exactly
|
