CGI-Quality said:
It's not a prove wrong/right scenario, it's just my take. Having spent extensive time with the game, and then re-reading some of the reviews, it seems that much of what the game had to offer wasn't discussed in some of them, such as gift sending. In just about every review, it's compared with Forza 3, which is reasonable and expected, but what isn't reasonable is when the review seems to lack a complete analysis of the end product. Another problem I had was the basis of judging the game on hype, and again, not strictly on the sum of it's parts. I'm not saying that there weren't any letdowns within the game (I was letdown by some of the visual inconsistencies and loading screens for example), but when I look at the entire package, the scores don't bother me as much as some of the words chosen. |
I can now see your point.....but we differ on what we define as unfair.
My point on all this is that you flip the release dates you flip the metas although not to the same value.....GT hype hurt in its meta(which I can also see as unfair, unnecessary nitpicking etc.) but it didnt hurt its meta nearly to the degree that FM3 did by raising the bar first.
Im really just using this as a means to procrastinate from studying for my engineering exam ....glad this didnt end up as what usually happens when we have a discussion
N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!