Thanks for the replies. I kept on thinking...
How do they pick the reviewers for a game? I mean, how can somebody be truly objective concerning a game? Take me for exemple, I would be the worst reviewer in the world. I love Tron and would give it an 8 out of 10 easy. I'd give that score because Tron reminds me of my cherished childhood and this movie has some good memories attached to it. Plus, I have been playing a lot of AC Brotherhood. Since Tron as some similar gameplay elements, I am inclined to give it a good score. I own every cd's of Daft Punk. Their music is of course in the game, so I am happier because of it, therefore giving it a higher score than somebody without all of the above would give.
Now, give me Call of Duty Black Ops to review. I hate FPS, so... I am not a big fan of multiplayer, so... I hate super short single player campaing, so... What score would I give it if I was the reviewer?
I know reviewers have their "niche" style of games, but come on! Since Tron is NOT broken, offers a long enough and fun single player and has a rewarding multiplayer, with good graphics and super music, if I'm objective, I would give it AT THE VERY LEAST an 8 out of 10.
Anyway, that's it with game reviews for me.
Proud owner and supporter of the YAKUZA games!
