By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
Immortal said:
CGI-Quality said:
Immortal said:

Sheesh, people! This doesn't prove your "undertrackedzzz!!!!!!" predictions true at all, >.>, that 2.5m has no source and is basically a loserish prediction from some guy or another, not from Sony or anyone reliable.

I seriously doubt that a random site can predict sales better than VGC.

In fairness, there have already been system adjustments. I'm thinking there will be game sales adjustments as well.

System adjustments there have been. Frequent and huge. That much I can agree on, though I don't consider it a valid excuse to attack VGC numbers everytime they appear.

Software adjustments, on the other hand, I haven't seen many of at all. Maybe it's just me, but I've never seen a game being off by over ~10%. Not a major one like this, anyway.

Depends on how long you've been here. There have been many software adjustments (some quite hefty). I wouldn't condone attacking VGC, after all tracking this stuff isn't an easy task. But I do understand some of the concerns.

It sure is a hard feat, and they don't deserv to be attacked. But of course there is a huge possibility of adjustments, for better or worse, big or small... Ioi always adjust so they can be precise, I don't see the harm in this.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."