fallen said:
The HD twins are beating the Wii, worldwide, handily, and that trend has accelerated a lot recentely. So the most powerful console(s) did win.
If there were two motion console, the Wii and the Apple iWaggle, hypothetically, and they split the motion/casual market in half, and 360 sold the exact same (which would put it higher than Wii and iWaggle seperately), would people say the 360 was crushing the opposition?
Also handhelds are a different beast. If you value graphics you will play a console anyway. So all the handhelds dont count.
The most powerful console, or at least close, has always won. Playstation was more powerful than N64 despite what people claim, or close enough. Xbox would have beaten PS2 if given enough time, and really did great only because it was more powerful, and also beat the vastly more entrenched Gamecube simply because it was more powerful. I remember back in that day the Nintendo fans constantly talked about how GC would crush Xbox once game X came out (zelda, mario, etc), but this never happened. Nintendo had one billion times more powerful software library than Xbox that gen (MS has no software at all, zero, to start, versus countless huge Nintendo franchises), but still lost to it simply because Xbox was more powerful.
Also Dreamcast lost to PS2. Saturn lost to Ps1, Jaguar lost to PS1/N64/Saturn, 3DO lost to PS1/N64/Saturn, all these were directly because they were less powerful. |
That's wrong. You are quite deluded.
XBOX360 and PS3 are not the same. They are both HD consoles but they are not twins and should be counted together.The fact is that the Wii beat the 360 easily which beat the PS3. The power = defeat trends has been working at the full effect.
Nintendo 64 was more poweful than the Playstation, there is absolutely no debate here? It's a fact.
Gamecube and Xbox had around the same power and sold the same. Neither of them had any chance to beat the less powerful PS2.
You need to check your facts before contradicting me.







