| Kasz216 said: I mean, lets cover EVERY scenario. Even the far fetched. 1) The UK denies to send him to Sweden. Winners: Assange & Wikileaks 2) The UK sends him to Sweden, and he's let go. Winners: Assange & Wikileaks 3) The UK sends him to Sweden and he's put in jail. Winners: Assange & Wikileaks, even if he really is guilt, too many conspiracy theorests like you wouldn't believe it, so it only helps wikileaks and makes it look like they're persecuted. 4) The UK sends him to Sweeden and he is sent to the US and is found innocnet. Winners: Assange and Wikileaks. 5) The UK sends him to Sweeden, and to the US and he is put to death. Winner: Wikileaks. They have other members, and now they have a marytr who was killed under a law literally no legal expert said he would be found guilty over. This is their biggest win yet. 6) He is killed somewhere enroute. Winner: Wikileaks. Again, they have their own martyr.
Where in this was there the least bit of benefit for the US government or Sweden? People pretty much ALWAYS side with the accused on rape charges anyway, famous or not. It's like the WORST crime you could try and frame someone for because even most people who comit the crime get off and get a pat on their back.
|
Great analysis.
The rape accusation is just a big pain.Literally every article or comment I hear or read believes it's just USA trying to frame him.
Wikileaks already won. Assange is a big martyr, the hero of the common people, civilian of the decade, a future Nobel Peace price winner and so on. It's disgusting.
And I agree that rapists almost always win too.
