XxXProphecyXxX said:
4k1x3r said:
pezus said:
Michael-5 said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Michael-5 said:
4k1x3r said:
@Jay520
Yep, and if the PS4 has similar structure (eventhough they said they want to make it easier to understand, I'm expecting it to remain the same for some things) then it's gonna rock right from the start. The gap between PS3's and X360's exclusives concerning graphics keeps on widening (until Gears 3 maybe) even multiplat games (AC:B for example looks better than Fable 3) have better graphics than some X360 exclusives. The lack of first party support will be troublesome for Microsoft, Sony on the other hand can offer good games even without thrid party exclusives. The difference between thrid party exclusives and first party, is that first party are completely dedicated to the console, while third party are offently using multiplat engines, and are developing another game in parallel.
|
The gap between the graphics from the PS3 and 360 keeps growing? I just played GT5, and it does not look any different then Forza 3, which came out a year ago. Sure in car is slightly better, but environments are better in Forza.
Fable 3 is not a graphical game, PS3 has Mod Nation Racers, and that looks the same.
The only game, IMHO that looks a level above the PS3/360 average, is Killzone 2 (not 3, 3D gaming has ruined the graphics in that game). Gears of War 2 won best graphics in 2008 just as frequently as Metal Gear Solid 4, and since then I haven't seen any games (other then Killzone 2) that look better. Sure Heavy Rain looks good, but no better then Mass Effect 2. God of War 3 is no more graphcially powerful then Alan Wake, and really after Killzone 2 there is a massive tie between 360 and PS3 games.
As for this 1st/3rd party comment, it hasn't really afffected 360 sales in the past, why would it start now? I also think MS will likely create or buy more in house studios next gen, they haven't really used Rare since they aquired it
|
WOW, that statement leads me to belive that even if PS3 ends up creating a game surpassing crysis visual you would still deny ps3 doesn't have graphical advantage.
seriously if you want to keep beliving that be my guess Im not the one fooling my self.
I finished god of war,Uncharted,KZ2,gears 1 and 2 and have Mass effect 2(PC) along with Metro2033, and yes best graphic heavy exclusive ps3 has to offer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>360.
Wake isn't even HD so comparing it to GOW3 is a joke let alone saying GOW3 isn't any better looking.
|
Crysis and Mass Effect 2 on PC >>> anything on PS3/360, just want to say that off the bat. I may not notice little graphical differences between Gears/MGS4 because I've seen a lot better, and I don't live in a dream world where little differences in graphics mean anything. The only major difference is PS3/360 > Wii, and there are a handful of games that stand above the normal (Gears, Killzone, MGS, Heavy Rain, Mass Effect, etc).
If you play Mass Effect 2 on PC, you clearly don't play it on max, and no God of War 3 does not look like anything special, Mass Effect 2 on 360 looks better. Killzone 2 is the only standout about the PS3/360 HD crowd. Lol God of War doesn't look that much better then Batman, so don't get all edgy.
|
Have you played GoW3? It clearly looks much better than Batman and imo better than ME 2 too.
|
It's Michael-5 you're talking to guys you're only losing your time... he's trying to make it look like he has a different point of view, which is true, but making it look like it's shared by alot of people is laughable.
Telling me that I'm reacting like this because someone disagrees with me and that I should make a thread about how awesome PS3 is only shows that he's not getting what I say. I'm reacting like this because I have enough of seeing him commenting on everything Sony related with b* arguments. But that may be just me...
|
I know,that batman>>>>god of war 3 graphics thing is such bullshit that sometimes I think he's just messing with us or played a different GOW and batman game than the rest of us did.....but hey its his opinion lets leave him be.
|
I have nothing against the fact that everyone has its own opinion. But the way he's writing his ideas gives me the feel that they are the only truth on earth. And I'm not only talking about Gow3 Batman comparison, but also about UC2 being matched by an X360 game. I love the X360, I don't own one because I don't have the money/time but I'm having alot of fun with a friend of mine on Halo/L4D/COD/Fable.
So I saw them running on HDTV, I saw my PS3 games running on HDTV and there's no way you can compare UC2 to something on X360, same for GOW3. It's only common sense, I dunno maybe my friends (X360 hardcore fans but still admit that PS3 exclusives have better grahics, generally) and me should see a practician or be treated for eye disease. So it's kind of annoying seeing someone posting things like "KZ2 is the only game that stands out on PS3" and make it look like the only possible truth on Earth.
And I'm making these facts appear as the only truth on earth because it is the truth, seriously, UC2/KZ2/GOW3 are still unmatched, and I can't understand how people can still argue about that. Maybe some things are not perfect in these games, but overall they have better graphics... Or you just played one of them. Sometimes I try to understand and see if I'm not mistaken because I may have missed something, but here for things like that, the only thing you need to do is to open your eyes, and see all these games running on an HDTV... Telling me GT5 is nothing special because Forza has better trees..., I didn't know the game was about analyzing evironment.
