Kenology said:
I do think it's a set-up... I'm just sayin' that it might not have been the CIA specifically. |
So who would bother to set him up for a crime that has an 8% conviction rate?
I mean, you can't think it was the women's plan by themselves. Do you know what kind of hell rape victims who take people to court go through? It basically becomes "hey lets go over every person you've slept with since you were 16 . and dig up anything else that might make you look like shit." While getting all kinds of harrasing calls and hate mail.
Plus, at least one of the women is a well known (in sweden) left wing feminist... why in the world would she set up the leader of an orginzation she supports and for what gain?
The Swedish government setting him up? When they have a 92% chance of screwing it up, and then an 8% chance of a lot of people thinking it was a conspiracy.
I'm just not seeing who gains from setting him up. What end game supports anyone BUT wikileaks.
The most likely conspiracy theory I could see... which still would be RIDICULIOUSLY unlikely woud be that the other main founder of Wikileaks, I'm forgetting her name right now... the lady who called him a misognist, set him up with their help, so Wikileaks would gain even more credibility while pushing him out of the way so she could be the main "head".
And that just sounds too much like a later year episode of Law and Order SVU when they decided every case needed like 15 twists.