By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
richardhutnik said:
Kasz216 said:

So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.

Not sure i'm getting the why.

 

Also, why are they saying they don't know who committed the Cyberattacks?  Some guy claimed responsibility for those.

 

The rape charges are completely unrelated, I mean they do nothing but hurt the US since everyone thinks it's behind it anyway.  Don't think the government is that stupid.

You know the rape charge is legitimate and not made up in order to shut down Wikileaks?  What i can see regarding this issue is that governments are trying to shut down Wikileaks permanently, so information they don't want to get out, won't be revealed.  It is more than just the names of agents and operations for security, it is also diplomatic relations, and other questionable activities they want hidden.

I don't know if the rape charge is legitamite.  I do know it's not made to shut down Wikileaks though... becuase it wouldn't shut down Wikileaks.

You know how I know?  Assange is in jail.... and Wikileaks is still leaking stuff.

Because Wikileaks isn't one guy... and if it was a plan to "make him look bad"  I'd think they'd pick a crime where people don't side with the accused immediatly.  Which tends to be the case with regular rape cases... let alone high value ones.