| alekth said: Well, hope that rape case (that is now called sex by surprise lol) is handled soon... though I do wonder what sort of new evidence there could be in a case like that, since it's been dismissed once already. How do you prove, after half an year, that you didn't consent to having sex without a condom, but were tricked (not forced) into doing it. And basically that only concerns the morning sex with the second lady. Because if a court manages to judge whether a condom broke or was torn on purpose months earlier, well that's one pretty messed up court. He refused to get tested for VD though and that also appears to be punisheable... but really curious what new evidence motivates reopening the case. |
How is that messed up? I don't think it's too hard to run some lab tests to see how the condom was ripped.
It would be just like how they can tell if a rope was cut or if it was worn away. You just need to study the matieral on the ends to see if it was old and stretched or just ripped and if it's consistant with the rest of the condom.
