Kantor said:
Kasz216 said:
Kantor said:
Kasz216 said:
So, they are illegally hacking websites that have exercised their legal right to choose who they do buisness with, because someone got arrested for a rape charge that will only help him and his cause.
Not sure i'm getting the why.
Also, why are they saying they don't know who committed the Cyberattacks? Some guy claimed responsibility for those.
The rape charges are completely unrelated, I mean they do nothing but hurt the US since everyone thinks it's behind it anyway. Don't think the government is that stupid.
|
It's extremely naïve to assume that Assange just happened to have a rape case filed against him after he published and shared leaked confidential information (which, incidentally, is not a crime).
|
A) Didn't the original case start BEFORE these leaks?
B) I see a connection, just not a crazy conspiracy theorist connection when there is literally zero benefit towards this conspiracy theory for the US or Sweeden.
Ever think that the leaks make him more famous, therefore more likely to get people to date him, and put him in a better chance to alledgedly aquatience rape people?
I mean, that's like saying you find it Naive that Tiger woods just happened to start cheating on his wife after he got famous.
Or that Ben Rothelesburger just started happened trapping women in bathrooms after he became successful.
|
a) No, it did not. It started before the Cables, but after the Afghan War diaries.
b) Sweden is doing what the USA is telling it to do. And the American government is trying to stop this man with all of their might. They clearly don't want any of this stuff getting out, which is believable, because the cables show that they are a bunch of spineless cowards who refuse to say what they believe for fear of vaguely offending someone - even when they all believe the same thing.
|
A) Yes. After he became famous... and therefore is in a more likely position to daterape people.
B) What? You do know Wikileaks isn't one guy right? He could turn up dead tommorrow and it wouldn't change a thing. Except he'd suddenly be a lot more vindicated and Wikileaks would get a lot of support. If this is the US government's doing, they are literally working against their own interests. Heck, Assange isn't even the most important person in Wikileaks. He's just the frontman.
