alekth on 07 December 2010
Well, hope that rape case (that is now called sex by surprise lol) is handled soon... though I do wonder what sort of new evidence there could be in a case like that, since it's been dismissed once already. How do you prove, after half an year, that you didn't consent to having sex without a condom, but were tricked (not forced) into doing it. And basically that only concerns the morning sex with the second lady. Because if a court manages to judge whether a condom broke or was torn on purpose months earlier, well that's one pretty messed up court.
He refused to get tested for VD though and that also appears to be punisheable... but really curious what new evidence motivates reopening the case.
