By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
4k1x3r on 07 December 2010
Edit Thread
XanderZane said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Michael-5 said:
4k1x3r said:

@Jay520

Yep, and if the PS4 has similar structure (eventhough they said they want to make it easier to understand, I'm expecting it to remain the same for some things) then it's gonna rock right from the start. The gap between PS3's and X360's exclusives concerning graphics keeps on widening (until Gears 3 maybe) even multiplat games (AC:B for example looks better than Fable 3) have better graphics than some X360 exclusives. The lack of first party support will be troublesome for Microsoft, Sony on the other hand can offer good games even without thrid party exclusives. The difference between thrid party exclusives and first party, is that first party are completely dedicated to the console, while third party are offently using multiplat engines, and are developing another game in parallel.

The gap between the graphics from the PS3 and 360 keeps growing? I just played GT5, and it does not look any different then Forza 3, which came out a year ago. Sure in car is slightly better, but environments are better in Forza.

Fable 3 is not a graphical game, PS3 has Mod Nation Racers, and that looks the same.

The only game, IMHO that looks a level above the PS3/360 average, is Killzone 2 (not 3, 3D gaming has ruined the graphics in that game). Gears of War 2 won best graphics in 2008 just as frequently as Metal Gear Solid 4, and since then I haven't seen any games (other then Killzone 2) that look better. Sure Heavy Rain looks good, but no better then Mass Effect 2. God of War 3 is no more graphcially powerful then Alan Wake, and really after Killzone 2 there is a massive tie between 360 and PS3 games.

As for this 1st/3rd party comment, it hasn't really afffected 360 sales in the past, why would it start now? I also think MS will likely create or buy more in house studios next gen, they haven't really used Rare since they aquired it

WOW, that statement leads me to belive  that even if PS3 ends up creating a game surpassing crysis visual you would still deny ps3 doesn't have graphical advantage.

seriously if you want to keep beliving that be my guess Im not the one fooling my self.

I finished god of war,Uncharted,KZ2,gears 1 and 2  and have Mass effect 2(PC)  along with Metro2033, and yes best graphic heavy exclusive ps3 has to offer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>360.

Wake isn't even HD so comparing it to GOW3 is  a joke let alone saying GOW3 isn't any better looking.

The graphic advantage is very minor. That's the problem. Gears 3 and Rage will be on par with Uncharted 2 and KZ3, and I don't see anything in the PS3 future that surpasses UC2 in graphics. UC3 will most likely be more of the same. Naughty Dog already said they pushed the PS3 graphic ability about as far as it will go with UC2. GoW3 looked as good as KZ2. The fact still remains the 360 is capable of producing the same type of graphics the PS3 has shown. Many developers have said this. They just haven't pushed the 360 to it limits yet.

Everyone says alot of thing, but is having hard time proving them. Being on par with UC2 x) Well we'll see about that.Gow 3 looking the same as KZ2, cool now we compare Shooters and Action games. Yayy!!!