By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Antabus said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Antabus said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Antabus said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
Antabus said:
Metallicube said:

I have a strong suspicion that if this game had been on the HD consoles, it would recieve a 9.5


I have even stronger feeling that if this game had been on HD consoles, it would receive all 6's.


But for being Disney and cute instead of dark and "mature", instead of for any gameplay problems.

No. If this game would be on HD consoles, it would not get free points for being wii exclusive.


You think those sites give bonuses for being Wii exclusive? Have you actually paid attention to them?

After playing many high rated wii exclusives, yes.


Wait. Which games do you mean, just so we know where we are coming from?

SMG,SMG2,TP,MP3,SSBB, Little king's story, Madworld... at least.

 

Perfect example is SMG (2), it gets a free pass on almost everything.

If it was a game on 360/PS3, it would not get 10 for graphics. Not even close.

It would be docked down for the godawful camera, gameplay would not be a 10.

A 10 hour game without online would not be getting 10 for lasting appeal.

Lack of real surround sound/bad voice acting would not get a 10 for sound.

 

But since it is on wii, http://wii.ign.com/articles/109/1091239p3.html

 

 

 


Those weren't given good scores for being Wii exclusives. Those were given good scores for fitting in what reviewers think makes a good game. It happens on the other systems. Look at the content of the reviews, and you see a lot of 360 and PS3 games are given good scores for really dumb reasons, instead of what actually makes those games good. Plus we get overrated games on those as well.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs