STEKSTAV said:
Not by defauly no.. but this newly found love for all Pachter estimates is lame. A estimation site that refrence their numbers with others who estimate. As if VGC didnt have it hard enough with the random public thinking their numbers are all made up, now they validate their stats with estimated numbers, and from a guy thats generally known for random quotes and misjudgements. |
Therefore, there is a problem with VGChratz's numbers by that logic.







