OntheEdgeofthemirror said:
nightsurge said:
OntheEdgeofthemirror said:
nightsurge said:
OntheEdgeofthemirror said:
PsicloneX said:
kinect is a GREAT idea give it a rest haters,i have noticed that in lots of gens the underdog always realeases the next big thing.
sony had their moment with ps1 full polygons and better effects than ninty or sega,the wii with wii-mote and now microsoft with kinect.next gen microsoft will have a great advantage over their last gen as people will know them better for introducing a fun new way to play with kinect.
give credit where it is due please.long live microsoft,long live kinect.i am happy to be finally gaming with my family,kids and wife and relatives and friends,
who used to ask me to grow up when seeing me gaming.now these same people want in on gaming because of their experience with kinect........JOB WELL DONE MICROSOFT AND KINECT,mission accomplished.some what just keep on trucking.
|
How is kinect new when it's just a minor technological upgrade from the pseye? And if Sony came out with kinect with the same games but without the massive hype/advertisement there is no way you would be praising them like you are MS
|
Ah, so your true intentions and bias have shown themselves.
|
How am I bias, unlike you I actually read the in-depth article on why Sony passed up 3D cameras and the main reason why is the technology didn't advance enough to give significant benefits over the pseye, So when I say it's a minor technological upgrade it is based in fact not biased
|
Lol, so an article by SONY would surely NEVER be biased against a competitors technology!!!!
It is based on OPINION, not fact.
You make me laugh. 
|
opinion of highly qualified people in this exact field, which is pretty much as close to fact as you get on things like this, and if it is such a major upgrade why didn't Sony make another ps camera and make it a 3D one? They were looking into it long before MS
|
Opinion of ONE person, one rather young Sony Engineer, who only deals with PS Move.
How do you know this? Bill Gates had been talking about controller-less gaming since 2007 and earlier for Xbox 360.
Sony chose the less costly path and the more convenient "copy-cat" method of "if something already works and sells tons, let's continue and refine that".
Also, do you really think the last thing Sony wanted was to introduce something that would add another $150 to the purchse price of their already more expensive system? No. There are tons of reasons why they passed on a controller-less setup and went with more of a Wii copy-cat.
MS is the one that took the risk of removing controllers completely.
