Kasz216 said:
Nah, the stuff is still pretty embarrassing. Since it's stuff "best left unsaid". It's not anything that "needed to be revealed for integrity!" though. Wikileaks is kind of a fraud. It's owner doesn't really care about integrity. It's owner just wants to make the US look bad. (If the owner did care about integrity, you think he'd go answer some questions about the crimes he's accused of.) |
I support WikiLeaks, they maybe of another country but our first amendment rights prevents them from being blacklisted in this country. The USA needs to be shaken up, and probably the entire government redone. Maybe revert the government back to the days of Andrew Jackson where the government was for the people and not for the corporation and tyranny against its people. But of course that would probably mean that everyone in the USA would need to drop their party affiliation and I doubt that will happen, but there are more and more independents registering from the younger generations so things might start swaying in the correct direction so this country end's its police state age and become the country that we know from the history books once again.
And their last leak embarrassed pretty much every major country with the war logs. So it definitely isn't an anti-USA group.










