By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mirson said:
darthdevidem01 said:
SleepWaking said:
CGI-Quality said:
Pyramid12 said:

Uhhh you guys know that this VERY SAME SITE gave GT5P 15/20.........let me say that again 15/20......

So according to this site Prolog is better than the full game.....LULZ!

Credibility is 3.....2.....1......gone!

Why??? Expectations have been raised since then, it might be a bad review I don't know I haven't played it yet, but this doesn't prove that.

I'll add the nail to this long due coffin called jeux.com's GT5 review:

JEUXVIDEO.COM reviews: 

*GT5 prologue 
Graphics 19/20 
Gameplay 16/20 
Durability 12/20 
Sound 15/20 
Overall 15/20 

*GT5 
Graphics 15/20 
Gameplay 14/20 
Durability 17/20 
Sound 15/20 
Overall 14/20 

IT MAKES NO SENSE THAT GT5 looses 4 points in graphics and 2 points in gameplay from prologue!!!

Different times, different standards. That's all there is to it.

Also, this thread rocks.

What different standards though?

At this present time in the gaming market according to what kind of odd standards does GT5 deserve a 15/20?



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey