MontanaHatchet: Your post actually makes no sense at all. At no point was I desperate to defend Nintendo, or any other company for that matter. I pointed out facts about the 3 systems, even mentioning my 360 gets the most play, my Wii the least.
How about instead of making a blanket statement such as that, you add to the conversation by actually disputing any of the facts I mentioned?
Fact is, you can't dispute any of it. People will talk about how the Wii has fallen, but they either haven't realized the things I pointed out, or they're purposely not mentioning it to sensationalize the other systems. Are you going to tell me you disagree that 70m units sold vs 40 mil units sold isn't a much higher saturation level? And do a comparison of failed systems ratio. Do a little research, you'll find that independant surveys have shown a 54% failure rate for 360's before the latest generation (Which is supposedly fixing it once and for all) and every single replaced system has counted as another sale. (Also proven and acknowledged by Microsoft themselves)
In reality, Microsoft probably has 1/3rd the saturation in the market Nintendo does. And when you look at it from that perspective, of course more 360's and PS3's will be sold over the 3rd place Wii. The Wii has less people left on earth to sell to.
So don't dismiss this argument as a fan boy. Again, I play my Wii the least of the 3 systems. This argument is based purely in fact. At least be honest enough to admit you're just unable to argue the facts, so you fall back on the "Don't defend the dying Nintendo brand! You sound pathetic!" You brought nothing to the table with your post.
