Jandre02 on 02 January 2008
| CAL4M1TY said: I say timed exclusive as well, just from a pure commercial stand point because: 1) There is no way a high production cost game like MGS4 would not want to maximise it's potential audience (Difference from last gen is that the xbox didn't have a audience worth porting for, this time around it does) 2) There is no way Microsoft would allow Sony to keep one of it's biggest fish forever I don't have any proof or evidence to support my thoughts, but I'm just using my logic here, so I could very well be wrong. Some more food for thought is that gaming companies have been notorious for going back on their word over the years, so just because Konami says exclusive, I wouldn't take it as concrete and certain forever. |
You dont know Sony is rich as hell too right? Why do people think that Microsoft can pay their way into everything? It is exclusive, forever. Sony may have already paid them off in some way.
And as for sales, this game will be the first KNOWN AAA title for the PS3. It will have a larger install base than Gears of War with more hype. And it will sell in EVERY region. This game will hit atleast 5,000,000 lifetime. It will more than cover production costs. And dont talk about attach rates, just look at Assassins Creed (better on PS3) and COD4 (better on Xbox360 but within 5%)
