By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian on 07 November 2010
Edit Thread
kowenicki said:
Torillian said:
kowenicki said:
 

I agree with much of that...   I would have a little more respect for the MOVE venture if they did get a little braver with it though, throw a big franchise at it and see what happens I say.


As someone who isn't a big fan of motion controls I would prefer they keep the big franchises as both control options.  It's certainly the best option for the consumer even if it disqualifies them for forum lists.


Its not about that for me, Reasonable understood what I was saying. 

Surely you would be a fan of it if it grabbed one of your favourite games and enhanced it in some way?  Why would you discount on the basis of not being a big fan at the moment?

If it enhances it then it doesn't have to be the only way to play it for people to take notice.  Wii fans have been saying for years that pointer controls are bar none better than dual analog for shooters and that will certainly be tested when Killzone 3, inFamous 2, and MAG 2.0 are released.  If they are distinctly better I'm sure people will take notice and the community for those games will move towards those controls and more will become fans of the Move regardless of whether the game is solely Move controlled.

And yes I get that you would respect the Move more if Sony put more behind it, but I think that giving the consumer options instead of trying to jam something down their throats is what I'd prefer.  It's not as though MS has committed to putting any big established franchise on the Kinect either so by that theory you shouldn't have much more respect for it than Move.

I discount the idea because I have played tons of great games on Wii that I didn't feel were enhanced by motion controls in the slightest.  The games that really are enhanced by it are new franchises made with motion controls in mind. 



...