MaxwellGT2000 said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
Pyramid12 said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
MaxwellGT2000 said:
LOL well you tell Disolitude to stay away he kinda has to as hes banned but even then I think I hate Lords of Shadow being called a Castlevania game as much as he does.
On another note I want to know what was bad about it since I didn't beat it just play for a little while, just put a spoiler tag for everyone that doesn't want to know.
|
If you hate that this one's called Castlevania, you're gonna loathe the sequel :)
|
It's not a Castlevania in my eyes its a serviceable action game that has the Castlevania name tacked on so it wouldn't be sent to its death sales wise. Nothing about it says Castlevania the game isn't even about Dracula he doesn't even show up, *spoiler* the final boss is Satan for petes sake!
|
*spoiler*
Dracula is at lord of shadows and its a she also dracula isn't the final boss she's one of the 3 lord of shadows.
|
*spoiler*
Ah really? I was glancing at the guide just to check out the bosses and went WTF when the final boss was Satan
|
GIMONGOUS SPOILERSSSSS!
Gabriel Belmont is Dracula and the sequel will be set in modern times.
|
WHAT?!?!?!
*hey guys if you couldn't tell by now this all has spoilers!*
RAGE QUIT!!! FUCK THIS SHIT! No seriously, number one what the hell is a Belmont doing becoming Dracula, number two we've already had a modern times Castlevania it was called Aria of Sorrow, number three because of that game we've already established Dracula is dead and had to reincarnate in Soma, number four for the hell of it a "combat cross" (dumbest name ever) is not a GOD DAMN WHIP the sacred Belmont whip is just a regular leather whip FFS!
Sorry so much of this has made me snap.
|
Well Lords of Shadows was said numerious times to be outside of the main series' timeline and in its own universe. Though Belmont becoming Dracula wasn't my problem, the god damn modern times was, I mean really? Was that necessary?
