WereKitten said:
Read what he said in french. He was not at all dismissive about, and he actually never mentioned, board games. He said that he thinks that people can see the difference between "a toy or a pleasant society game (experience) using the Wii" ("un jouet, ou à un jeu de société très sympa avec la Wii") and something that is more of "an multimedia center really strong on videogames" ("un vrai centre multimédia avec vraiment un jeu vidéo extrêmement fort"). Sounds more about "you can do much more than playing games on the PS3", not "playing on the Wii is bad" to me. Plus, since he went on in the past about how he considers his own work more an interactive drama than a classic videogame, I doubt very much that there's any derogatory sense in the distinction, or that he thinks any worse of games, either video-based or not. He's simply interested in different things and he's going along Sony's and MS's idea of pushing their machines as all-round entertainment centers. |
You can take what I said, and NOT apply it the designer of Heavy Rain then. Take what I said and apply it to anyone who begins to trumpet movies as games, and ignore "Press X to Jason" from this, although X for Jason can fit into any place where gameplay matters, and not excessive dependence on stories. I would go with the original French, but I don't read it. Apparently the original poster had an agenda or the writer of the article did, if that isn't right. In this, I will stand by, if the game industry keeps thinking it wants to make movies, it will end up bankrupting itself.







