Goldeneye IGN Review - And the Verdict is....

[Roma]

masschamber said:

LordTheNightKnight said:

Voltaire said:

KungKras said:

LordTheNightKnight said:

KungKras said:

CGI-Quality said:

IGN's definitely surprises me.

However, GameInformer's is closer to what I expected, but still lower than I expected. I thought it would get a 7 at least:

http://gameinformer.com/games/goldeneye_007/b/wii/archive/2010/11/02/goldeneye-007-review.aspx

O_O that review was just non-stop bashing of the game, judging from those words, I'm suprised he didn't give the game a 4 or someting.

It's game informer.

I haven't read anything from them (now I'm glad I haven't), so from your comment, I take it they like to bash Wii games.

I suspected that when I saw that the reviewer managed to sneak in the word 'gimmick' among all of the vague or outlandish complaints.

Theyre notorious for being against many highly regarded Wii games. I canceled my subscription when it got to the point that Super Smash Bros Brawl was called a flop, and NMH was given a 6. IF it has anything to do with the Wii, i wouldnt trust GI....then again i wouldnt trust most other media with reviews anyway, be them Wii or otherwise.

It's not just the Wii. Sometimes their reviews can boggle the mind. The recent Alien Vs Predator got mixed reviews, but, unless I'm mistaken, the GI review complained that the Predators had to use stealth.

did you notice the don't bother without the classic controller, game informer still struggles with the idea that people actually like shooter with the wii remote, mark my words, using the wii remote will be described as cheating within days of the games release

it is not like enyone will force them to use the CC controls. if they call us "cheaters" then they can "cheat" as well :P