By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Voltaire said:
KungKras said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
KungKras said:
CGI-Quality said:

IGN's definitely surprises me.

However, GameInformer's is closer to what I expected, but still lower than I expected. I thought it would get a 7 at least:

http://gameinformer.com/games/goldeneye_007/b/wii/archive/2010/11/02/goldeneye-007-review.aspx


O_O that review was just non-stop bashing of the game, judging from those words, I'm suprised he didn't give the game a 4 or someting.


It's game informer.

I haven't read anything from them (now I'm glad I haven't), so from your comment, I take it they like to bash Wii games.

I suspected that when I saw that the reviewer managed to sneak in the word 'gimmick' among all of the vague or outlandish complaints.

Theyre notorious for being against many highly regarded Wii games. I canceled my subscription when it got to the point that Super Smash Bros Brawl was called a flop, and NMH was given a 6. IF it has anything to do with the Wii, i wouldnt trust GI....then again i wouldnt trust most other media with reviews anyway, be them Wii or otherwise.


It's not just the Wii. Sometimes their reviews can boggle the mind. The recent Alien Vs Predator got mixed reviews, but, unless I'm mistaken, the GI review complained that the Predators had to use stealth.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs